English
中文
EnglishNews
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on December 23, proposing a clear requirement: all patent applicants and patent owners not domiciled in the United States or its territories must be represented by a registered U.S. patent agent or patent attorney when conducting patent matters before the USPTO.

From 'DIY Possible' to 'Certification Required': Core Drastic Change in Rules
According to the draft revisions to 37 CFR Part 1, the USPTO will make the following key adjustments:
Complete Prohibition on Self-Representation for Non-U.S. Applicants
Whether it's an initial filing, responding to office actions, or handling patent ownership changes, as long as the applicant or patent owner's domicile is not within the U.S., all documents must be signed by a registered patent practitioner. Even forms for paying issue fees (like PTOL-85B) are no exception.
Combating Fraud as a Primary Motive
The USPTO explicitly stated that there has been a surge in fraudulent micro entity certifications (to obtain fee reductions) and document forgery issues in recent years. When pro se applicants abandon applications, the USPTO cannot track or investigate. Registered practitioners, bound by the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct, have an obligation to cooperate with investigations, and violations could lead to disciplinary action—this essentially installs a 'regulatory tracker' on every application.
Aligning Globally, Improving Efficiency
Currently, major patent offices worldwide (such as the EPO and the CNIPA in China) require foreign applicants to proceed through local representatives. This move by the USPTO aims to 'align with international practices' while reducing examination delays caused by non-standard documents.
Who is Affected?
This rule has far-reaching implications, primarily targeting the following groups:
All individual inventors who are not U.S. residents
They will no longer be able to directly file patent applications with the USPTO.
Companies and enterprises headquartered outside the United States
This includes all Chinese companies planning to enter or already engaged in U.S. patent portfolio activities.
Entities filing applications through informal channels
The new rule aims to eliminate low-quality or fraudulent applications submitted via non-professional agencies.
Compliance Countdown: Applicants Must Act
Although the new rule is still in a 30-day public comment period, the USPTO has clearly indicated it is 'determined to proceed.' It is recommended that all companies planning to enter the U.S. market:
Immediately Assess
Check existing applications for any instances of self-filing or partial representation.
Select a Representative
Be sure to choose and appoint a reliable U.S. patent attorney or agency to avoid significant losses due to minor savings.
Article Recommendation
[U.S. Patent Major New Regulation] Non-U.S. Applicants Must Use a U.S. Representative! USPTO Issues New Rules — A U.S. Patent Shock? Crackdown on Irregular Practices!!!
Understanding the European Unitary Patent in One Article: A New Choice for Multi-Country Protection After Grant~
European Patent Validation Guide: Grant Does Not Equal Protection Across Europe!
"Latin America Gold Rush Plan" - How to Choose? Target These Three Countries First!
Good News! The China-Brazil Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Pilot Extended for Another Five Years
In-Depth Look at U.S. Design Patent Extension Cases Part 2: CPA to Challenge Rejections, Divisional Applications to Split Themes – Solving All Challenges!
In-Depth Look at U.S. Design Patent Extension Cases Part 1: Continuation and CIP - Unlocking Flexible Strategies for Scope of Protection
UK Intellectual Property Office Announces Official Fee Adjustment: Average 25% Increase Effective April 2026
China-LAC Summit Kicks Off, Ideal Time for Intellectual Property Layout
Tapping into the Latin American "Blue Ocean" Market? Lacking This Makes It All a Waste of Effort!